Megan Thee Stallion Wins Defamation Case Against Milagro Gramz

In a decisive ruling, Megan Thee Stallion has emerged victorious in her defamation lawsuit against Milagro Gramz. The ruling holds the blogger accountable for spreading false claims. The verdict highlights the emotional toll that misinformation can take on public figures. It underscores the importance of accurate reporting in media coverage.

The lawsuit stemmed from allegations that Gramz collaborated with Tory Lanez to undermine Megan’s account of a shooting incident. This action cast doubt on her credibility. The case also cited a deepfake video that intensified Megan’s emotional distress. This added complexity to the proceedings. Legal analyst Meghann Cuniff, who covered the trial, reported, “A jury has found Milagro liable for defaming Megan Thee Stallion and for intentionally inflicting emotional distress by collaborating with Tory Lanez and promoting the deepfake video.” Cuniff noted that, despite some mixed jury responses on media classification, Gramz was ultimately recognized as a media entity.

While the jury’s decision represents a landmark moment, the defamation claim could still face dismissal. This could happen if a judge rules in favor of Gramz’s media classification. Nonetheless, the court awarded $75,000 in damages. This is a notable financial and symbolic victory for Megan, who has long spoken about the stress caused by Gramz’s coverage.

Who is Milagro Gramz?

This ruling marks a turning point for Megan Thee Stallion, who has frequently discussed the psychological strain imposed by misleading media narratives. In a landscape where social media can shape public perception overnight, the verdict offers a measure of validation. Observers will be watching closely to see how this decision may influence broader discussions about celebrity reporting, accountability, and journalistic ethics.

Milagro Gramz gained prominence as a gossip blogger, particularly during the widely publicized trial involving Megan Thee Stallion and Tory Lanez. While she claims to maintain editorial neutrality, her coverage was often perceived as favoring Lanez. This attracted criticism from fellow journalists. Following the court ruling, Gramz faces a $75,000 financial obligation. This brings the chapter to a close just days after Lanez’s appeal for a retrial was denied.